Finally I started to write a few words regarding my blog, my work, and the course I did.
It all started this year in the month of March, over the architectural design professor IV Antonino Saggio. Initially, the purpose of the blog is in communication between student and teacher in every time and from anywhere in the world. More importantly that is accessible to all. Even these things are enough to present and communicate their work or thought.
to devote a large part description the course and the environment in which we worked, a kind of summary which unfortunately has not been said or written at the end of the course on the blog.
With enthusiasm, I chose the course of prof. Wise also knew that stimulated some of my friends, I read his essays, descriptions, in short, an intellectual with a word.
The organization of the course and the atmosphere is very fun, tense and ambiguous. The lessons that held the prof is very interesting, many things have been repeated thousands of times, so many different readings and descriptions of famous buildings. The most important and perhaps the purpose of the course [from what I understand (or maybe not)] is the information free on the internet and architectural design, specify - the image of architecture.
I will not discuss much on the skill of reading the design method, to write about architecture, not about information, just google, the writings, lectures, books, ten blog, the work of students, the theses of students. I would just like to point out here because it is all about the search for a highly subjective, of course by the teacher. In a few words is not the architectural design that we all know, not even a particularly innovative or far, is an exercise of composition which, in my opinion should make every student - in the first year of studi.Perché? an infinite freedom, very few constraints, exaggeration of formalism, suitable for functional program area of \u200b\u200bstudy [ UrbanVoid ], all in one week.
All the tools and methods that have prevented us to use are very useful, but the lack of information about its design, lack of assistants, it could lead to a good project. In fact all this has led to results very weak, not very developed by the students (except some who are truly committed despite threats and heavy words of the professor), this was seen just before it.
For those who are interested in computer architecture, I recommend this course, is a good place to start thinking about that, get it and develop it. For those interested in architectural theory, just follow the lessons and read a lot.
